From the category archives:

Bar Exam Tips & Tricks

Jan
24

Adam Ferber is the former Examinations Director for the State Bar of California and grader of 40 California Bar and First-Year Law Students’ Examinations.  He provides intensive, individualized tutoring and coaching to applicants for both exams, as well as counseling and advocacy for applicants appealing their unsuccessful exam results. Contact Adam at www.ferberbarreview.com or on Facebook at Ferber Bar Review – Student Resource Group.

“Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.”  Niels Bohr

Clairvoyance is the ability to know things like the future through the use of your mind alone. Many bar review courses sell clairvoyance.  They claim that their panels of experts make useful predictions about what types of questions will appear on the next California Bar Examination, often based on what has (or has not) appeared on the Exam in the past.

Can you predict what will be on the Bar Exam?  For ten years I was the State Bar Executive responsible to put together the Exam … and I don’t think so!  But hey…why don’t I just tell you how it was done.  Then you can evaluate the bar reviews’ claims for yourself.

Let’s deal with essay questions first.  Part 2 of this Blog will concern itself with performance test questions.

The Committee of Bar Examiners buys its essay questions from out-of-state law professors.  It keeps its question inventories in “banks” by subject matter. Members of the Committee’s Examinations Development and Grading Team supervise the banks.

Each year Team members request questions on specific topics for their subject matter banks.  The Examinations Director relays the requests to the law professor suppliers.  However, the solicitation doesn’t always produce the desired questions. Just as all law professors are not created equal, so do their question submissions vary in subject matter, quality, and utility. Sometimes the banks are replenished to the Team’s satisfaction; sometimes they’re not.

Question selection for a specific bar examination starts when each Team member nominates one or more questions from his or her banks.  It’s true that what has been tested in the past is taken into account. But what do you do if there are no good quality questions in topics that you’ve requested, topics that you believe should be tested next?  My experience was that the Team members then looked instead to the best quality questions in their banks to nominate, even if their subject matters had been recently tested. I agreed with that approach.

Question selection doesn’t end there.  What follows is a long and thorough process that  involves extensive discussion and debate at all levels: starting with the Team, and then with the Office of Admissions staff and finally, with the Committee of Bar Examiners. It includes seemingly endless edits to ensure that these high stakes questions are of consistently excellent quality.  If need be, questions can be replaced at any step in this process to further assure that kind of quality.

To my mind, all of this is right and proper.  It’s both anticipated by and allowed by the explicit Scope of the Examination.  All areas that fall within the Scope are fair game to be tested, and for good reason.  After all, once you pass the Exam and proceed to practice law for money, you’d better know what you’re doing.

Copyright 2010 Adam Ferber and www.ferberbarreview.com.  Reprinted by permission.

{ 1 comment }

Jul
14

Adam Ferber is the former Examinations Director for the State Bar of California and grader of 40 California Bar and First-Year Law Students’ Examinations.  He provides intensive, individualized tutoriing and coaching to applicants for both exams.  Contact Adam at www.ferberbarreview.com or, on Facebook at Ferber Bar Review – Student Resource Group.

“I took the road less traveled by, and that has made all the difference.” Robert Frost

I’m sure you like to figure out how things work.  So, let me ask you this:  In all your preparation for this bar examination that will mean so much, have you ever actually tried to figure out how the performance test works?  And if you could, would it change your approach to writing your answer?  Would you take “the road less travelled by?”

Take “the File.”  It tells a story, but it tells it all out of whack.  If you were the narrator, one story might go like this.  After a workout at their gym, two acquaintances go out for a beer.   Tom agrees to lend Byron his car to go to a job-related meeting. The meeting happens to be at a bar though, where Byron drinks more beer.  On his way back to return the car he uses the car to run an errand.  Then…guess what?  He hits a pedestrian, and all hell breaks loose.  This performance test – PTA from the February 2005 California Bar Examination – is the result. Check it out at: http://admissions.calbar.ca.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=D8Nvfy-KI%3d&tabid=2269

While you’re doing that, think about how the File works.

This File, as do all others, scrambles a smooth, chronological narrative into out-of-order pieces.  Those pieces have names: In this PT, “memorandum,” “police report,” “Medical Center” admitting form.”  If you attempted to answer this question, you’d read those pieces in the “out-of-order” into which the drafters arranged them. And then you’d outline them.  How?

Here’s one way that you might not have thought of.  Instead of (or in addition to) your present outlining technique, reassemble the scrambled pieces into the original story.  What happened first, then second, and so on.  Your effort doesn’t have to be extensive -  just enough to get you thinking about “the story” as well as “the facts.”

With the chronology in hand you may notice:

-           That if the question calls for a summary of the facts, your summary will be more comprehensible.  Moreover, it will exhibit a necessary analytical skill – giving coherence to the disaggregated “factoids” you might pick up from a police report or deposition transcript as a practitioner;

-           That your answer writing efforts to use the facts will likely be more effective if you remember them in the order that you’d normally expect them to take.  You may recall facts more quickly; and

-           That your discussion style may be less “exam-like” and more “lawyerly,” if you’ve had even the brief chance to think about the question as a situation that occurred in real time.

Does this seem counter-intuitive to the techniques that you’ve been taught?  Are you concerned that it might cost you time that would be better spent elsewhere?  Both reactions are to be expected.  However, if it also sounds intriguing or potentially helpful, why not try it once or twice as you prepare this month.  If it works for you, you’ll be walking successfully down “the road less traveled by,” on your way to a passing grade.

Copyright 2010 Adam Ferber and www.ferberbarreview.com.  Reprinted by permission.

{ 0 comments }

Jun
29

Adam Ferber is the former Examinations Director for the State Bar of California and grader of 40 California Bar and First-Year Law Students’ Examinations.  He provides intensive, individualized tutoriing and coaching to applicants for both exams.  Contact Adam at www.ferberbarreview.com or on Facebook, at  Ferber Bar Review – Student Resource Group.

“Another turning point, a fork stuck in the road/Time grabs you by the wrist, directs you where to go/So make the best of this test, and don’t ask why/It’s not a question, but a lesson learned in time” -Green Day

In case you didn’t get the memo, in addition to the purposes explicitly attributed to them by bar examiners, performance tests test your ability to perform legal tasks under intense time pressure.

So while you’re muscling up for those two three-hour sprints next month, consider these strategies:

1)         Outline For More Than 90 Minutes

California performance test instructions suggest that you allocate at least 90 minutes to your outline. Especially if you take the examination on your laptop, consider spending at least 100 minutes outlining.  That’s because this instruction predates the use of laptops by applicants.  It was composed in the days when there were only “writers” and “typists,” who were constrained by their more primitive writing tools, and it has never changed.   If you have reasonable typing skills and the ability to cut and paste portions of your outline into your answers, you can probably say all you need to say in your answer in a shorter time.  Extra outlining time can give you a better grasp of how best to construct your answer.

2)         Leave Yourself Time to Do The Hardest Things Twice

My students reach a point of diminishing returns when they take extra test time to bolster their strengths.  In fact, those strengths show up nearly as well when we cut their time.  For example, the good writers write nearly as articulately in fewer words.  They are better able to adapt.

However, students’ weaknesses do seem to improve with more time and attention.  Do you repeat yourself when you’re stressed? Edit for a few minutes longer.  Do you often start writing, only to realize that you missed something that you need to add?  Leave some time (and some space) to capture that last minute insight.

Taking a few minutes away from what you’re confident of and turning them over to your weaknesses is likely to get you more “bang” from that time.

3)         Take a Little Time to Relax

You heard me.  Try this the next time you’re in the middle of writing a practice exam.  (1)  Check your time. (2) Close your eyes and breathe in to a count of seven, filling your lungs with as much air as possible. (3) With your eyes still closed, hold your breath for a count of four, and then exhale for a count of eight.  Do this twice.  (4) Open your eyes and check your time. If you feel clearer and better focused, then practice this exercise and prepare to use it during the exam. It will be well worth the time you spend on it.

Copyright 2010 Adam Ferber and www.ferberbarreview.com.  Reprinted by permission.

{ 0 comments }

Breaking Down Buyer’s Remedies Under the UCC

Sean Silverman is an attorney and teacher who has prepared numerous students for the MBE, both in person in New York, as well as over Skype for those located outside of New York.  For an indication as to his teaching style, visit his website at http://www.mbetutorial.blogspot.com.  And while there, feel free to submit a question.  [...]

Read the full article →

Find Out What the Performance Test and “The Simpsons” Have in Common

Adam Ferber is the former Examinations Director for the State Bar of California and grader of 40 California Bar and First-Year Law Students’ Examinations.  He provides intensive, individualized tutoring and coaching to applicants for both exams.  Contact Adam at www.ferberbarreview.com or, on Facebook, at Ferber Bar Review – Student Resource Group. How Knowing the History of [...]

Read the full article →

Character Evidence: Breaking It Down!

Sean Silverman is an attorney and teacher who has prepared numerous students for the MBE, both in person in New York, as well as over Skype for those located outside of New York.  For an indication as to his teaching style, visit his website at http://www.mbetutorial.blogspot.com.  And while there, feel free to submit a question.  [...]

Read the full article →

Bar Graders and “the Blink Moment:” Create the Best First Impression of Your Essay Answer (Part 5 –Constructing Your “Discussion”)

Adam Ferber is the former Examinations Director for the State Bar of California and grader of 40 California Bar and First-Year Law Students’ Examinations.  He provides intensive, individualized tutoring and coaching to applicants for both exams.  Contact Adam at www.ferberbarreview.com or, on Facebook at Ferber Bar Review – Student Resource Group. “Truly successful decision making relies [...]

Read the full article →

Studying for the MBE: A Practical Approach

Sean Silverman is an attorney and teacher who has prepared numerous students for the MBE, both in person in New York, as well as over Skype for those located outside of New York.  For an indication as to his teaching style, visit his website at http://www.mbetutorial.blogspot.com.  And while there, feel free to submit a question.  [...]

Read the full article →

Bar Graders and “the Blink Moment:” Create the Best First Impression of Your Essay Answer (Part 4 – Rules of Law)

Adam Ferber is the former Examinations Director for the State Bar of California and grader of 40 California Bar and First-Year Law Students’ Examinations.  He provides intensive, individualized tutoring and coaching to applicants for both exams.  Contact Adam at www.ferberbarreview.com or, on Facebook at Ferber Bar Review – Student Resource Group. “Truly successful decision making relies [...]

Read the full article →

Why It’s Hard to Tutor Students for the MBE

Scott Pearce is an experienced bar examination tutor in Los Angeles.  He provides bar examination tutorial and home study services for bar students throughout the country.  Previously, Pearce lectured and tutored at Bar/Bri, BarPassers, and PMBR.  For more information, visit Pearce’s Web site at http://passthebar.com. How can you tutor somebody to get better at a [...]

Read the full article →
Bar Exam Brief, News and tools to help you study for and pass the bar exam.

Copyright © 2012 Multistate Edge

All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy