Answer A is incorrect. There is no threat of imminent violence here, because this is a prior restraint of future rallies. Free speech cannot be limited on the basis of future, speculative violence.

Answer B is incorrect. While the injunction is overly broad and vague because it fails to sufficiently define what acts are prohibited, C is also a true statement and, therefore, D is the correct answer.

Answer C is incorrect. The speaker was entitled to a hearing prior to the issuance of the injunction because the injunction severely limited his freedom and there was no emergency justifying the ex parte proceeding. However, because B is also a true statement, D is the correct answer.

Although A is usually true under the Brandenburg standard, the words of the injunction aren’t narrowly tailored to achieving their objective.