From the daily archives:

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Jun
17

Adam Ferber is the former Examinations Director for the State Bar of California and grader of 40 California Bar and First-Year Law Students’ Examinations.  He provides intensive, individualized tutoring and coaching to applicants for both exams.  Contact Adam at www.ferberbarreview.com or, on Facebook, at Ferber Bar Review – Student Resource Group.

How Knowing the History of Columbia Can Help You Ace the Performance Test

“Lionel Hutz – court appointed attorney.  I’ll be defending you on the charge of …Murder One!  Wow! Even if I lose, I’ll be famous.”  (Cartoon) lawyer Lionel Hutz

If you’ve watched television at all over the past 20 years, you probably know about the Simpsons’ hometown of Springfield (exact state still unknown).  You may also know a lot about Mr. Hutz, Disco Stu, Lake Springfield, Duff Gardens, and all the people and places that make the town feel like home to us as well.  But how much do you know about the State of Columbia, the fictional locale of the bar examination’s performance test?

Since its establishment, along with the PT almost thirty years ago, much has come to light about Columbia.  Its law offices grow by at least two every time the bar examination is given.  They include Castro & Ruz, Sanquist & Davis, and one particularly successful firm named after my two sons.  In its state courts (including the county courts of Jackson and Galena) and the federal courts in its Northern and Southern districts, lawyers have litigated claims to sunken treasure, mistreatment of animals, forced medical treatment, and theft of trade secrets.  So long as the performance test is given, hitherto unknown Columbians will have their moments in the sun, just as have Ralph Panine, Kai Banerjee and my personal favorite, investigator Johnny Ripka.

Why should you be interested in this history?  Why should you even consider taking precious study time off just to read through the libraries and files of long-ago litigated battles in this fanciful place?

Because each time you read a performance test and the selected answers that accompany it at the Cal Bar’s Office of Admissions’ website, you are learning about how these test items are constructed, including:

-           The relationship between the facts in the File and the legal authorities in the Library;

-           How what would be a smooth chronological narrative in a magazine article about the dispute the PT involves is broken up and distributed through the File;   And, how to reconstruct that narrative to suit your purposes.

-           Exactly how Columbia’s legal community writes its settlement offers,  persuasive memos, and even, on occasion, their discovery plans;  Just as Marge’s sisters, Thelma and Patty, love MacGyver, so do Columbia’s senior lawyers love carefully crafted subject headings.

To put it simply, you are honing your clinical skills.  And that’s what the performance test is intended to measure!

So, even if it feels counter-intuitive, stop outlining and writing, and just read a few of these test items.  And, if you have any energy left after that, you may enjoy an episode of The Simpsons.

Copyright 2010 Adam Ferber and www.ferberbarreview.com.  Reprinted by permission.

{ 0 comments }

Jun
17

Congratulations to the seventh winner of our free t-shirt contest!  Mark won the random drawing for the week of June 11th.  Our sincere thanks goes out to all our MicroMash alumni out there who have taken time to leave praise and constructive feedback about our bar review program.  We love hearing from you! Keep it coming and stay tuned, as another winner will be drawn tomorrow!  You can hear what our customers have to say about us or join the discussion by visiting this blog post.

{ 0 comments }

Jun
17

In which of the following instances is the defendant guilty of a crime?

A. The defendant intensely dislikes the victim. One day, he is walking on a dock and observes the victim in the water, drowning because he cannot swim. A life ring is next to the defendant on the dock. The defendant does nothing and the victim drowns.

B. The defendant has decided to kill the victim by shooting him with a high-powered rifle from a great distance. To sharpen his ability, the defendant goes to a rifle range and is practicing in the area legally designated for rifle target practice. The victim, contrary to regulations, has trespassed into the target area and is accidentally hit and killed by a bullet from the defendant’s gun.

C. The defendant, while intoxicated one evening, was driving slowly down a dark road when the victim, who was also intoxicated, walked into the rear side of the defendant’s car and was injured. The defendant did not perceive, and would not have perceived had he been sober, that the victim had run into the car. The defendant therefore did not stop and report the accident.

D. He returned to the restaurant on Tuesday, determined to take a coat as good as the one he lost the day before. Spying a coat much like the one he left in the restaurant, he took it from the coat rack and left the restaurant. In fact, the coat, having been returned to the rack by the person who had taken it by mistake, belonged to the defendant.

{ 12 comments }

Bar Exam Brief, News and tools to help you study for and pass the bar exam.

Copyright © 2012 Multistate Edge

All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy