Answer A is incorrect. There is no threat of imminent violence here, because this is a prior restraint of future rallies. Free speech cannot be limited on the basis of future, speculative violence.

Answer B is incorrect. While the injunction is overly broad and vague because it fails to sufficiently define what acts are prohibited, C is also a true statement and, therefore, D is the correct answer.

Answer C is incorrect. The speaker was entitled to a hearing prior to the issuance of the injunction because the injunction severely limited his freedom and there was no emergency justifying the ex parte proceeding. However, because B is also a true statement, D is the correct answer.

Broad refers to the class recipients of the law and vague refers to terms in the legislation. But in this case would apply to the prior restriant levied on Ronan.